ATAVISTIC CHEMOTHERAPY & IMMUNOTHERAPY

Monitoring of Antitumor Response

The anticancer response to Atavistic Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy can be monitored in different ways, and over various time periods, depending upon the malignancy and its location. We will need to obtain baseline studies to determine the extent of your disease and size of tumors prior to initiation of therapy. Some of these studies will be repeated on a monthly basis and will be compared with baseline evaluations to ensure that you are responding to treatment.

The most common studies or examinations we need are listed below. Some of these studies can be requested by your family doctor or your oncologist.

(1) Changes in your signs and symptoms: Changes in your patterns of cough, pain, swelling, strength, alertness and body weight can all help us to determine if your treatment is working.

(2) Visual inspection of tumors: We would like to evaluate tumors which are visible to the naked eye using weekly photographs, as well as measurements, whenever possible. 

(3) Chest X-rays: CT-scans are indisputably one of the best tools to evaluate lung disease. However, a CT-scan of the chest delivers radiation equivalent to 70–442 chest x-rays, depending upon the radiation used. For this reason, chest CT-scans are spread out as much as possible (for example, every four months or more). We will monitor lung tumors, lung metastases and/or fluid in the chest with monthly chest X-rays. 

(4) Ultrasound: Again, although CT scans of the abdomen and mammography are reliable ways to evaluate abdomen and breast disease, we prefer to monitor responses to treatment of abdominal tumors (e.g., liver metastases) and breast and armpit lymph nodes using ultrasound. We never want to unnecessarily bombard patients with radiation.

(5) CT, MRI and PET scans: Although these are the state-of-the-art diagnostic imaging tools, they have the disadvantage of delivering excessive radiation.  Nevertheless, when used appropriately, the benefits of CT, MRI and PET scans outweigh the risks. We will use them from time to time and will request that your family doctor or oncologist collaborate in obtaining these studies for you. 

(6) Other studies: Tumor markers in blood such as Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA), CA-15.3, CA-19-9, etc. and other laboratory studies may also be used to monitor response.


Monitoring of Antitumor Response

The anticancer response to Atavistic Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy can be monitored in different ways, and over various time periods, depending upon the malignancy and its location. We will need to obtain baseline studies to determine the extent of your disease and size of tumors prior to initiation of therapy. Some of these studies will be repeated on a monthly basis and will be compared with baseline evaluations to ensure that you are responding to treatment.

The most common studies or examinations we need are listed below. Some of these studies can be requested by your family doctor or your oncologist.

(1) Changes in your signs and symptoms: Changes in your patterns of cough, pain, swelling, strength, alertness and body weight can all help us to determine if your treatment is working.

(2) Visual inspection of tumors: We would like to evaluate tumors which are visible to the naked eye using weekly photographs, as well as measurements, whenever possible. 

(3) Chest X-rays: CT-scans are indisputably one of the best tools to evaluate lung disease. However, a CT-scan of the chest delivers radiation equivalent to 70–442 chest x-rays, depending upon the radiation used. For this reason, chest CT-scans are spread out as much as possible (for example, every four months or more). We will monitor lung tumors, lung metastases and/or fluid in the chest with monthly chest X-rays. 

(4) Ultrasound: Again, although CT scans of the abdomen and mammography are reliable ways to evaluate abdomen and breast disease, we prefer to monitor responses to treatment of abdominal tumors (e.g., liver metastases) and breast and armpit lymph nodes using ultrasound. We never want to unnecessarily bombard patients with radiation.

(5) CT, MRI and PET scans: Although these are the state-of-the-art diagnostic imaging tools, they have the disadvantage of delivering excessive radiation.  Nevertheless, when used appropriately, the benefits of CT, MRI and PET scans outweigh the risks. We will use them from time to time and will request that your family doctor or oncologist collaborate in obtaining these studies for you. 

(6) Other studies: Tumor markers in blood such as Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA), CA-15.3, CA-19-9, etc. and other laboratory studies may also be used to monitor response.


View Comment( 4 )

Susan M Thu, Apr 17,2014 01:59 AM
Fantastic! Thank you Dr. Arguello
Rob Anderson Tue, May 06,2014 05:00 AM
Very informative.
Kasual1234 Fri, Sep 26,2014 01:44 PM
I find this website incredibly interesting and exciting that someone is thinking out of the box to find new ways of dealing with Cancel. This should be headline news not something that one just happens upon. I disagree with the authors evaluation of alternative medicine. It is unfairly evaluated if you consider that most getting alternative cancer treatment do so AFTER using conventional and are in advanced stages and compromised immune systems and have been giving up by conventional medicine and still there are many successe using it. Many are still turing their ill health completely around using alternative methods. Thank you for going the extra mile and daring to break away from conventional thinking.
Dr. Diego Theumann (Ph.D. organic chemistry,73 y. old) Wed, Aug 05,2015 04:49 PM
Is there any experience in treating multiple myeloma with atavistic chemotherapy ? I have already had for cycles of conventional chemotherapy (Bortezomib,Dexamethasone,Lenalidomide and Zoledronic acid) to treat my MM and the results seem to be promising. But my peripheral neuropathy (legs and feet) has become worse due to some of the chemicals used to treat the MM. Hope to hear from you ! Best regards. Diego.
Leave a Comment